Top Shelf Brands Holdings Corp. (DKTS)

[hedge_fun]

Here's my email exchange AGAIN about the options...........

For context......I was looking through some OTC filings of various other tickers, can't recall any specific ones, and I saw options mentioned, as well as the "triggers". So I sent this email to Alonzo. Mind you, this is BEFORE Q1 and Q2 came out, though I knew it was suppose to be coming, and mention it in this email a couple of days BEFORE they were filed. I have in bold what Section 4 says in the OTC filings.

from: <[e-mail]>
to: Distinguish Yourself !!! <[e-mail]>
date: Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 1:32 PM
subject: Options Question for Sonfield

Alonzo,

I was looking through some other company filings and noticed options were listed. If you look at the annual report you filed, Section 4 included options, but you put N/A.

The list shall include.....and all shares or any other securities or options to acquire such securities issued for services,

http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=TEMN&id=117470

This may need to be corrected or explained in the filings. It needs to be discussed with Sonfield.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Now we discussed this for some time while I was still in Houston, even after Q1 and Q2 came out, and especially then. If you recall, I POSTED ALL ISSUANCE'S NEED TO BE DISCLOSED, and I had that discussion with Alonzo. I reminded him of his PR's about being fully reporting and said ALL ISSUANCE'S MUST be disclosed with audits for the past 2 years.

He insisted the court case would be over soon, FINRA would approve the ticker/name change, and the chill would be lifted. Then all would be disclosed in the Form 10 filing. That's why he said this in his response AFTER I found out he never discussed DISCLOSURE with Sonfield, which was my concern as CC "asked" me about. Was I ever concerned about MY AGREEMENT BEING DISCLOSED? Sure, that's why I "asked" Alonzo to see if a correction was in order for the annual report. Notice Alonzo mentions CLEANING THINGS UP, which is when I would get options per our agreement.

from: BU92 <[e-mail]>
to: [e-mail]
cc: [e-mail],
[e-mail]
date: Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:37 PM
subject: Re: Options Question for Sonfield

When corporate actions are complete which is a task at hand we will re-visit this. Me asking Mr. Sonfield and giving you a answer is not a priority or all that we have had to go through. Let's stick to the subject at hand in which there will be a review after an corporate action has taken place as we remain to get this thing cleaned up.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Like I told others, I was being cautious. My first email was BEFORE Q1 and Q2 came out and was about the annual report. After he failed to disclose ANYTHING in Q1 and Q2 as well, I wanted to be sure I had something in writing to him about DISCLOSURE, which is why I said this to him and copied Sonfield.

from: <[e-mail]>
to: BU92 <[e-mail]>
cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>,
"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
date: Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:13 PM
subject: Re: Options Question for Sonfield

You were in no way obligated to file with OTC Markets earlier this week, except to regain your "current" status. You are however obligated to file accurately. That's why I asked about Section 4 BEFORE you filed. You said you would address my questions with Mr. Sonfield and choose not to. That's why I forwarded the email to Mr. Sonfield. Simply to see if Section 4 pertains to me. If it doesn't, then no harm, no foul.


Alonzo had told me they were going to file Q1 and Q2 that week. But as I said, I understood Section 4 to say this......

The list shall include.....and all shares or any other securities or options to acquire such securities issued for services,

Other tickers mentioned options that had not been exercised. It seemed a bit odd, but I thought it better to err on the side of caution and "ask" Sonfield.

I guess the "spin" is, I got mad because Alonzo didn't give me options that I asked for, which isn't true. Not sure what they are trying to say.

When WOPR came out I walked away. I guess what little bit of integrity I may have, which is far more than these clowns have, is something they wish to attack because it exposes them.

Didn't Alonzo also tell them I had some lame idea about buying a vineyard and he laughed at it? Yet he emailed me about being a Director and/or Owner, which I posted.

His lenders have sent me inquiries wanting to know who I am and what I did for the company. They obviously don't trust Alonzo (OTC 101 I guess). How do I know filings are coming out BEFORE THEY DO?

How do I have the Pena Letter?

How do I have shareholder lists?

How do I have emails between Mazzo and Huffman?

How is it I have emails between Alonzo and Sonfield......and Kara?

How is it I have an opinion from an attorney named Pierce (no relation) sent to FINRA about the 1B shares because FINRA won't accept Sonfield's opinions?

How is it I have SO MANY documents that can't be order from a court or NV SOS, but I had no agreement?

I get the distrust of Alonzo. I guess the lenders are worried about how much info I have on them....if any.

I don't want anything from TEMN. It's become what Alonzo claimed to despise. I got mixed up with a clown, which I regret, but I don't want shares to further dilute this pig.

I wanted shares because it was going to get cleaned up so Alonzo could grow the company.